Doubao
Official site not cited
Online takes differ. Some say winter range drops hard; others say it is enough. Official specs were not found — compare a few reviews before you decide.
Site build
When users ask AI,
When users ask AI,
get you into the answer
We deliver a new brand site. It looks professional to people — and when they ask Doubao, DeepSeek, or Yuanbao, the answer cites your official wording, not forums or rivals.
The Gap
A beautiful site — and AI still cannot find you
Users already decide in full sentences. If your site advantages never reach Doubao or DeepSeek answers, you are absent at the decision. These are the six cases brands hit most often.
People can finish it; AI treats it as missing
Motion is polished and the product copy is there. Ask AI and it acts as if the site does not exist — it stitches answers from forums and social posts.
Specs locked in a long image
Range, price, and credentials sit in posters and video. People like it; AI gets nothing, so answers will not cite you.
AI cannot tell who you are
Legal name, founding year, and certificate numbers are scattered — sometimes only in a license photo. AI may mix you up with another brand, or skip you.
The content exists — it cannot get in
The site is closed; AI cannot enter. However clear the product pages are, answers will not use your official wording.
One number, three versions
The site says 600, dealers say 580, press another number. AI trusts none of them and cites someone else.
One redesign, every old URL dies
Pages that were cited now open blank. AI will not keep citing URLs that vanish — brand voice drops with them.
The first three are hard to patch on an old site. Rebuild around “will AI cite you” instead of patching.
Self Check
Score the site you have now
No engineer needed. Marketing or brand leads can tick the ten items below. Few ticks usually means AI answers leave you out.
Good Fit
When a rebuild with us makes sense
This is a new site for the client, not a patch on the old one. In the six cases below, a rebuild is usually cheaper and more effective.
A site redesign is already planned
If a redesign is already planned, fold readability in once. Extra work is mostly planning — the cheapest time to do it.
The site is almost all images and video
The look is complete, but selling points and specs live in images. You cannot patch “official wording” onto that — content has to land as text.
The current stack will not move
A locked website builder, or a legacy stack no one owns. Forcing a patch is often costlier and slower than rebuilding.
Content lives off the official site
Specs live in decks, customer questions in sales scripts, cases on WeChat — and the site has almost nothing. What you need is to land the content on the site.
A new brand or new line
No site yet, or a new line needs its own. Starting from zero is cheapest — build to the readability bar now and skip the redo.
Wording has never been unified
Specs, credentials, and company facts have several versions. A rebuild is the chance to lock one set of facts.
Conversely: if you already score nine or more, a rebuild may not be needed — fix the last items and go straight to content-layer GEOis the better spend. We will say so in the conversation.
Deliverables
What the client gets is something they can verify
At launch we walk the checklist: not a memo — a live site you can verify.
AI can finish the product intro
Titles, specs, and FAQ sit on the page. Even without motion, AI reads the same official wording.
It can tell which company you are
Spell out legal name, business, and credentials so AI does not mix you with another brand — answers name you.
New content keeps getting found
New products and news should be found without begging for indexation. The site directory updates so later answers can keep up.
URLs stay valid
Product and article URLs stay short and stable. Shares and AI citations survive a redesign.
One external version of the facts
Lock company facts, specs, and certificate numbers to one version — the site and external messaging use the same set.
Looks legitimate, loads securely
The whole site is served securely — no “not secure” warning. People and AI stay when it looks trustworthy.
Comparison
The same user question, two sites, two answers
Both sites may look fine to people. The gap is whether Doubao answers with forums — or your own wording.
Regular site build
AI answers leave you out
User: is this 600 km range trustworthy?
Doubao
Official site not cited
The site looks complete, but AI cannot get official specs, so it pieces forums and social posts. The brand is absent at the decision.
The site we deliver
Same question — the answer comes from you
User: is this 600 km range trustworthy?
Doubao
Cites the official site
Per the brand site: CLTC range 605 km; 30%–80% fast charge about 18 minutes; about 78% retention at −10°C. Plan winter trips on that figure.
Specs and FAQ sit on the page; AI can read them on open. After the question, users hear your official wording.
Share of AI answers that cite official channels
6%
54%
From a six-month NEV project. First make the site readable to AI, then sync content across channels. The lift is not from the site alone. The client name is confidential.Related articles
Process
Four steps, six to ten weeks
Each step has a clear deliverable. Whether AI will cite you is set from week-one questions — not patched before launch.
4Standard steps
6–10Weekly delivery cycle
10 acceptance checks
NewBuild delivered
Step 01
Prep
Requirements and question list
First lock business, industry, competitors, and the questions users ask AI. Site pages are reverse-engineered from that list — not copied from a template.
- Build requirements and schedule lock
- Industry high-frequency question list
Step 02
Planning
Architecture and content plan
Set the IA and the question each page answers, and collapse company facts, specs, and credentials to one version. Finance and healthcare lock off-limits wording here.
- IA map and page-content list
- One external wording set
Step 03
Execution phase
Design and development
Design and engineering run together. Server rendering, structured data, and stable URLs go in during build — not as a launch afterthought. You can publish articles from the CMS.
- Design comps and implementation
- Content admin
Step 04
Acceptance
Launch and acceptance
Check all ten items, move valuable old content, and redirect old URLs so bookmarks do not break in a batch.
- Ten-item acceptance checklist
- Content migration and redirects
FAQ
Questions we hear before every build
Ordinary site builds are judged by looks and load speed. We ask one more question: if a user asks Doubao this, will it cite your site? Pages are reverse-engineered from real questions, so official wording sits on the page where AI can use it. This is a site we deliver to the client.
Usually 6–10 weeks: 1–2 weeks for requirements and the industry question list, 1–2 weeks for architecture and content, 3–5 weeks for design and development, and about 1 week for launch and acceptance. Large or multilingual sites take longer. The schedule is locked in step one — we do not add scope as we go.
No. Valuable old-site content moves over; old URLs redirect. Bookmarks and existing indexation do not die in a batch. We check this item by item at handover.
The site decides whether AI can find you;GEO optimizationThen it decides how to describe you. If it cannot find you, optimized copy never reaches answers — so the site usually comes first.
Usually picked up in 1–4 weeks, depending on each platform. The build guarantees readability, not rank or mention count. To track mention-rate change, pair it with DZOS monitoringretest on a cycle.
We do not sell a spec sheet as the product. What works is on-page copy — product intro, specs, FAQ — that AI can read on open. A sheet is included, cheap to add, but results do not depend on it.
First agree what the site should answer when users ask AI
Leave brand, industry, and the current site URL. We return a page map and a schedule for your business.